During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
由于不能导出，缩略图是我截图拼接而成Gemini Canvas打开 Gemini 网页，选择 Canvas 模式，即可让 Gemini 根据内容生成幻灯片，任务完成后可以导出到谷歌幻灯片，就能下载为 PPTX 格式。
，这一点在爱思助手下载最新版本中也有详细论述
홧김에 이웃 600가구 태워버린 남성…발단은 아내의 ‘외도’
But look at what's happening now. Someone needs information, they open ChatGPT or Claude or Perplexity, they ask a question in natural language, they receive a comprehensive answer immediately with sources cited. No clicking through multiple websites. No comparing different perspectives. No scanning search results pages. The AI synthesizes information and delivers a direct answer, fundamentally changing the discovery process.。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Hinkley Point C
В Финляндии предупредили об опасном шаге ЕС против России09:28。91视频是该领域的重要参考